BETT 2014A hectic couple of weeks at school culminated with a “day off” at the BETT show at ExCel in London yesterday. I have been many times before, when it was held at Olympia in previous years, and seemed to have more intimacy and unity at its former home than it did in the enormous ExCel barn. It was a day for being blown away by the size of it all, wearing out some serious shoe leather, and asking questions of ourselves and of the direction of technology generally. I would have liked to tour the place in the company of Albert Borgmann. His reactions would have been interesting to watch and would have raised deeper questions than I can ever hope to pose. Some of the questions I had were about things that we might need in school (not a lot of them – actually; the needs are fairly obvious), but others were more challenging – the usual Luddite ones like – do we actually need all this stuff? What happens when digital data completely degrades? Why make things that have a short shelf life anyway?

Other questions that buzzed around in my head were the following:

  • How does this technology help us live lives of communal rather than personal responsibility?
  • Is there anything here that will contribute to the building of community?
  • Are the values behind this show simply those of a driven technology (i.e. technology for its own sake) or is it designed to meet an identified (non-technological) need?
  • Are there educational technologies here that will help us care for the earth better?
  • Is there any sign at all of technology self-limiting? In other words, are there constraints that technology producers are putting on their efforts so that more human qualities might be more fully expressed? Do technologists ever accept that there is a limit to their technology?

There were some answers to these questions in the central BETT Arena, where an artist was engaged continually in drawing answers from participants’ post-it notes to the following question:

BETT 2The answers were many and various and I have tried to include as many of them as I could find in this post; it gives some hope for the future that compassion and the heart of a teacher might survive – even flourish beyond – the rise and presumed eventual collapse of technologies touted at the event. Certainly the technology was less messianic than it has been in previous years, and so were the attitudes. The answers to the questions provoke more questions, so they work as good answers, at least! They may not be the deepest or most philosophical, but they betray the anxieties of humans that the qualities that make us human, those qualities that come from the reflection of God’s image in us, must both survive and transcend the technological tools we use. We dare not be subsumed by them.BETT 11BETT 9BETT 8BETT 7BETT 6BETT5BETT 4???????????????????????

Advertisements

About Huw Humphreys

I am a headteacher in the city of Milton Keynes, where I have been since April 2011, looking to make education effective for the whole child and keeping a distant relationship with the powers that be and their narrowing approach to education... but most of all I am looking to find out what it means to be both a follower of Jesus Christ and a passionate educator in the midst of an unsettled community. I am also a part time musician, part time linguist and lover of history and literature...committed both to freedom to learn and depth of learning for all our children. The views on this blog are all my own, and not in any way those of the school I lead!

Please comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s