palace_of_westminsterSomebody commented to me that my absence from this forum over the past two weeks has been “refreshing”. I am glad. Actually, I have had tons to think and write about but little opportunity. So, much must go unsaid, which is exactly how it should be.

But of course there is huge uncertainty politically at the moment, both in the UK and Europe and trying to keep up with the sales talk of the various political entities, whilst trying to ignore the undiluted manure that they chuck at each other has taken a lot of thinking and effort. In the background, there has been the sane view of Tony Judt in Ill Fares the Land and Postwar which has helped me refocus on what I really believe in politics and the absolute necessity of creating a system that minimises inequality and gives a proper role to the state that can care for and provide for its people rather than farming it out to the “private sector”.

Education has of course been at the forefront of much of the debate. Why this should be mystifies me, when all three major parties (are there only 3?) in England (there, I have qualified it – but is this still the case?) have virtually the same approach. It goes approximately like this:

“Schools are, for the most part, not to be trusted, and certainly do not recognise what is best for children, so we will have to tell them that standards are not high enough and that despite us throwing millions of pounds at them, there is more they can do, on probably the same budgets as last year. Schools’ only purpose is to provide fodder for the workforce so “the economy” can grow (not as baldly put as this, but nearly) and so more testing/inspection/school meals/early years support is required (the balance of this to be decided by each political party) so that we can ensure that we can make it to the top table of nations, hold our heads up high, close the gap (whichever gap is currently being looked at – there are a variety), get good PISA scores and make sure our party (and not the others) gets the credit for the improvement. Amen.”

That is pretty much it. Only the Greens and Plaid Cymru seem to differ from this narrative, whilst the SNP is in a stronger position than most of us to talk about education.

Two blog posts, published today and yesterday, address this from two different angles. The first is from Stephanie Northen from the Cambridge Primary Review and is a lesson in how to express frustration cogently whilst also revealing the common feeling that nobody really knows who to vote for. The second, written from a depth of anger and revolt at all that the Conservative party have wreaked upon education, is this heartfelt cry from the author of the Disappointed Idealist blog. Both are worth reading. There will be others and I am not going to expound further here right now.

Simply to say that we are in extreme danger of letting down a whole generation of children by pursuing assessment and testing as a proxy for deep learning. Fear of the electorate, or parents or the “competition” prevents politicians from seeing this clearly. As John Hattie said recently, politicians in general are not silly people, but they do silly things for silly reasons. I wish it were otherwise, but it is not. We simply have to find practical ways in schools of defending children from the likely numerous dire outcomes of this election and the politicians and departments who will implement them.

A postscript to this post comes after reading this survey of headteachers’ opinions of the current education policies of the major parties. The frustration of this is that in this area, as in so many other areas of policy, the major parties are simply formulating policies of irrelevance to most voters. For my colleagues genuinely to feel that the best we can say of any party is that one in five support Labour education policies is a mark of how little we feel understood by those who are “leading” education in the UK.


About Huw Humphreys

I am a headteacher in the city of Milton Keynes, where I have been since April 2011, looking to make education effective for the whole child and keeping a distant relationship with the powers that be and their narrowing approach to education... but most of all I am looking to find out what it means to be both a follower of Jesus Christ and a passionate educator in the midst of an unsettled community. I am also a part time musician, part time linguist and lover of history and literature...committed both to freedom to learn and depth of learning for all our children. The views on this blog are all my own, and not in any way those of the school I lead!

One response »

  1. kayetkm says:

    I was reading an article this morning about children’s spirituality in Church of England Schools in the UK and thought of your blog and looked it up in my feed. If only for this one line: “Simply to say that we are in extreme danger of letting down a whole generation of children by pursuing assessment and testing as a proxy for deep learning.” I am glad to have read your post today.

Please comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s